« Creating Digital Signatures for use in Acrobat | Main | Do more with Acrobat; it's not that hard. »

October 18, 2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Leonard Rosenthol

There are some significant improvements to the Redaction function in Acrobat X that I am surprised you didn't mention.

* Searching (and Replacing!!) codes
* One click addition of codes (including multiple codes on a single item)
* Summarization of redaction operation & their codes (ALSO NOW IN READER X)
* and more...

and of course there is also the new "Sanitization" feature which will ensure that no hidden information gets out.

Leonard Rosenthol
PDF Standards Architect
Adobe Systems

Ernie Svenson

Hey Leonard:

You're right that I failed to mention the improvements to the reduction function in Acrobat X. I wasn't able to explore these new functions for myself, and that's the only reason I didn't discuss them. Obviously, anything that improves the reduction function will be useful to lawyers. Thanks for bringing those reduction features to the readers' attention.

Martin Crossman

Any changes/improvement to the Portfolio tool?

Thanks for the heads up and review. I'll be joining the mentioned group to learn more.

Martin Crossman
President - REDI Analysis
www.redianalysis.com
Developer of the REDI Office

TomStirewalt

Nice job on the review, Ernie. Long enough to be informative, short enough to actually read and absorb.

Ernest Svenson

Portfolio has more configurability in the way of aesthetics, and some improved functionality. I don't use Portfolio that much. The new features are the ability to include links to web pages and to YouTube videos (or other online video). The only problem is that, in the current beta version, the image for online content is non-descript and so it looks kind of lame. I suspect Adobe will fix this.

Fred Bruno

How much will this cost?

Browning

I examined the email AA sent to me. It looked like it was for PC only. Will version 10 be for both PC and Mac?

Ernest Svenson

Adobe X will be available for Mac and PCs. No word yet on what it will cost, but I presume it will be the same as Acrobat 9.

Chris Jones

I sure hope Adobe comes out with a utility to deconstruct PDF Portfolios in a batch process (eg. persons archiving Outlook/Exchange email/PSTs to portfolios which end up as evidence) so that the deconstructed components still retain their relationships (eg. source/attachment relationships) either in data or file naming convention. Receiving PDF Portfolios for E-Discovery processing is challenging and frustrating for both litigation support and litigation teams because we can't extract the portfolio's components and preserve the component's relationships - critical in E-Discovery.

Also, it would be extremely helpful if PDF Portfolios had a different file extension that a standard PDF, or having a batch processing mechanism to identify them within a collection of standard PDFs to separate them out.

Drew

Can anyone comment upon or point to a review of the relative robustness of the OCR text routine in Adobe Pro X vs. 9.4? Thanks.

Ronnie

Is there a way to print Search Results in Acrobat X? (If there's a way in 9, PLEASE point me to it).

Ernie

I don't know how to print search results in Acrobat 9, and don't think that there is any way to do that. In Acrobat X, however, there is a function that lets you save search results. When you choose to save you are given the option to save as a .PDF or a .csv file. If you save as a PDF you can then print out from that document.

The results that are saved show the file name and then a short snippet of the language that is relevant within that file is set forth. And by short snippet I mean about 100 characters, or about 15 to 20 words.

For a more complete description of this, see my most recent blog post: http://www.pdfforlawyers.com/2010/10/how-to-save-or-print-search-results-in-acrobat-x.html

Jeff N

How could Adobe break what are two of the most commonly used features in Acrobat 9.4.5 in such an obscure way (Search highlighting and Pages Thumbnails multi-selection), never have regression tested this basic function given the 3 month (or more) release cycle, and conveniently not have broke it in Acrobat X? Then, there are web forum recommendations pushing to upgrade to Acrobat X — which completely changed the User Interface and will result in significant loss of productivity while bridging the learning curve and dealing with new functional/compatibility problems. We don't have any commitment on if or when Adobe will fix these rather peculiar 9.4.5 bugs that are 9 weeks old or correct the apparently gaping holes in their software development/test process. Adobe, please don't try to change/add features to Acrobat 9 unless they are critical since your software development/release process is apparently semi-out of control (unless these bugs were secretly intentional to drive upgrade revenue in which case you have bigger legal concerns). Please strive towards application stability by changing only what is absolutely necessary in a conservative "do no harm" type manner. You have made many customers very frustrated, lowered your brand loyalty, and reduced confidence in major releases like Acrobat X.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter